Alghorba TV streaming all day in Arabic from Sydney Australia. please stay with us.. and enjoy our programs

Ghost of a chance


Peter Nunn, Tokyo correspondent
A well-heeled Japanese buyer has defied the doomsters and taken delivery of Asia's first 338kW Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe.

Times might be tough but in Japan, but clearly the well-heeled still know how to live. Case in point: Japan has become the first nation in Asia to take delivery of Rolls-Royce's magnificent Phantom Coupe.

Just in case you were wondering, in Rolls-Royce speak, "Asia" includes Japan, Korea, Greater China, Australasia, India, Singapore, Thailand, Philippines, all locations where Rolls has customers.

Rolls's local arm tells that a buyer in Osaka was the first in this part of the world to get the 6.75-litre V12 Phantom Coupe, ordered through Cornes and Company, the official Rolls importing arm (which also handles Ferrari and Maserati). But Australia, surely, cannot be far behind.

The Phantom Coupe first came out at this year's Geneva Show and the order book in Japan opened up this July.

They say if you have to ask the price with Rolls, you can't afford it but just for the record, the Phantom Coupe kicks off in Japan for ¥49.98 million (call it A$800,000 or so), making it something of a bargain against the possibly even more desirable and wickedly politically incorrect DropHead Coupe ($852,000).

That's before taxes, note, so a lot more folding stuff will be required to get the two-door, four-seat 338kW Coupe licensed and on the road. And once you get into Rolls' Bespoke order program, of course, the sky's the limit...

Oh, and isn't it remarkable how good the Coupe looks against the "normal" Phantom sedan?

2009 Nissan 370Z - Road Test




BY JOHN PHILLIPS,
PHOTOGRAPHY BY TOM DREW, KEVIN WING, AND THE MANUFACTURER


*We once heard William F. Buckley Jr. say that, and it sounded cool.
At the Z car’s U.S. introduction 40 years ago, Datsun wisely chose not to employ its domestic “Fairlady” moniker, which Yutaka Katayama knew would have been tantamount to calling, say, the Corvette the “Cocker Spaniel.” Since then, the hyphen that originally separated the “240” from the “Z” has vanished, 1.3 extra liters of displacement have more than doubled the original engine’s output, an actor briefly made Mr. K a red-bespectacled TV star, and the car’s price has swollen by about $27,000.
Nissan refers to this latest Z as an “enhancement,” likely largely a male enhancement, rather than a whole new car. The company is being modest. The wheelbase is shorter by 3.9 inches, width is up 1.1 inches, length is down 2.7 inches. The larger engine (same V-6 as in the Infiniti G37) produces 332 horsepower, a bonus of 26, and sits 15 millimeters (0.6 inch) closer to the pavement, which is now hugged by a true unequal-length control-arm front suspension. Although Nissan’s engineers had to add nearly 200 pounds of safety and regulatory bric-a-brac, the car is only 33 pounds heavier than the 350Z we tested in June of ’07, in part because the hatch, A-pillars, and doors are now aluminum. We know, because we attacked them with a “Big Sky” fridge magnet.
Two models are on offer: the base car, starting at $30,625, and a Touring version, which leans toward luxury—leather, Bose stereo, so forth. In either case, options are few: a nav system, a $1300 seven-speed automatic, and a $3000 Sport package. The latter, as fitted to our test car, includes a limited-slip diff, 19-inch wheels, spoilers, larger brake rotors and aluminum calipers, and “SynchroRev Match” for the six-speed manual.
Every body panel is fresh, and the styling, penned in San Diego, is largely successful, although it ignited some vivid office discussions. First, the dual shark’s teeth in the grille look like the outcome of a dolorous ninth-grade study-hall class. The oversize chrome door handles, which we’d paint flat black or body color, would look more at home on a Nissan Armada. And the roof so steeply cants downward that its leading edge forms a sharp, hard crease we’re calling the “Alfalfa peak”—an odd ridge on a car that is otherwise a lava-lamp jubilee of rounded Oprah-ness. Nissan says the roof is intended to look like the GT-R’s. We ask, “Is that important?” A convertible 370Z will arrive as a 2010 model.
The cockpit is richer than its predecessor’s, with graceful contrasting stitching, a kneepad on the center console, and a classy hinged leather panel covering the hole you’ll create if you don’t order the nav system. There’s now even a glove box. The accelerator pedal is floor mounted, and its travel feels freer and more linear. The steering wheel is asymmetrical, neither circular nor oval, but its size and grip are perfect. Although the wheel is adjustable for rake alone, the entire IP moves along for the ride, assuring a clear shot at the gauges. The driver’s seat is more aggressively bolstered than the passenger’s, and both are upholstered in nonslip fabric. It’s a tight fit, with the more globularly hipped among us contemplating the possibility of embarrassing chafing. The size of the shift knob, the pedals’ placement, the three big HVAC controls—all represent an ergonomic hat trick. What’s more, the monstrous cross support aft of the seats, which nearly bifurcated the cargo area, is now replaced by a simple aluminum tube that does minimal damage to storage space.
At the track, the 370Z easily outpaced its predecessor: 0.3 second quicker to 60 mph, a half-second quicker to 100. What we have here is a $35,000 car that accelerates to 60 mph a mere 10th behind a Porsche Cayman S. The new Z’s 30-to-50 passing potential is now about a second better, and it picked up 0.9 second in its 50-to-70-mph burst. Skidpad grip has risen from 0.93 g to a tendon-bending 0.97 g, and the new brakes (no longer Brembos but Akebonos) have tightened stopping distance to 159 feet—race-car territory, kids.
On the highway and in traffic, the 370Z is one Z-licious companion. From rest, the car rolls away elegantly, asking for a mere handful of revs above idle. Clutch takeup is predictable, and the shifter’s throws are so short and smooth that your forearm barely moves. Power manifests as low as 1900 rpm and flows in one great, seamless rush to redline, with no discernible variable-valve step. Brake-pedal travel is minimal, taut, linear. And the structure feels as solid as a Porsche 911’s, issuing exactly zero rattles or squeaks.
The steering is a little heavy but is always accurate, quick, yet never nervous. Aim for a pebble at an apex, and you can place the inside front tire atop it. Select a path through a sweeper, and no further corrections are required. Over scabrous pavement, the 370Z tracks better than its predecessor, and it has a locomotive’s sense of straight-ahead. Brain-damaged text messagers will be in heaven—that’s how long you can take your hands off the wheel.
Body motions are virtually nonexistent, and the ride can be borderline harsh, but both traits remain appropriate to a dedicated sports car. In the hills, the 370Z is simply BMW-ish in the manner its engine and transmission talk to each other. Jump in or out of the throttle, and there’s no jolt, no windup, no neck snap. Revs build and dissipate rapidly but without notice. The car eagerly establishes a soothing driving rhythm, such that glancing at the speedometer always produces a shock. When did we get going this fast? That’s a sure-fire sign of sedulous engineering.
Up to about eight-tenths on the Blow-Your-Lunch meter, the Z is remarkably neutral. On low-friction surfaces, however, you can deactivate the stability control and induce shooting chest pains courtesy of big throttle-induced oversteer. What’s just as fun and less stressful is to apply 100 percent power out of every corner and let the stability control sort things out.
Speaking of miraculous driving aids, here’s one we weren’t expecting. If you order the Sport package, the manual trans is fitted with the aforementioned SynchroRev Match, which blips the throttle during downshifts. We did some patent searches and believe this electronic boon to be a first on a wholly manual transmission. Upon hearing about it, we warned Nissan that our old-fashioned heel-and-toeing was pure Nureyev—no electronic wet nurses for us. We were wrong. Our own dance steps matched revs accurately about 80 percent of the time. Nissan’s electronic shoes matched revs 100 percent of the time. And you can’t fool the thing. A downshift from fifth to second that requires 4500 immediate revs? No problem. That tricky 10-mph downshift from second to first on a cold morning? Piece of cake. Enter a turn so fast that your whole focus is on braking and steering? Let Nissan manage the blipping. If you still think you can do better, you can deactivate it. But those creamy downshifts add so greatly to the car’s prescient interaction with the driver that we bet you won’t.
Our complaints are few. Visibility astern is slim through that gun slit of a backlight—now sans wiper—and the rear-three-quarter windows don’t even qualify as portholes. The V-6’s exhaust note, at least inside the cockpit, isn’t much sexier than a Pathfinder’s. The gas gauge comprises 16 orange LEDs that are hard to read and look like a temporary fix conjured by the doofus who forgot to order the real gauge. Finally—and this is the big one—the sticky Bridgestones double as megaphones. Boom, slap, echo, hiss, the swishing of water, the pinging of pebbles. You name a road-borne sound, and the tires can magnify it. Perhaps it’s the fault of paper-thin wheel-well liners, because neither engine nor driveline NVH find their way so effortlessly to your tympanic membranes. At idle and at wide-open throttle, the 370Z is louder than its forebear. We’d trade a couple of points on the skidpad in return for less racket and a slightly cushier ride.
Do we love the 370Z? It might now be instructive for the reader to review the text and take a census of superlatives. This latest Z offers amenities sufficient to satisfy a commuter, without doing any obvious harm to the car’s original charm—its bare-bones purity.

Bentley Arnage (2010): the spy photos




By Tim Pollard

In one year's time Bentley top brass will tug the covers off the replacement to the Arnage limo – but our spies have been beavering away and have caught sight of the new saloon on test in Britain. This grainy photograph was taken with the mother of all telephoto lenses near a test track, but it reveals the big new Bentley for the first time.

The new Arnage will be even bigger and posher than today's model, but will it also signal the end of the old Rolls-era character of its predecessor? This scoop photo suggests it will keep the ocean liner presence of today's car and sources in Crewe say there is plenty of old-school charm in the 2010 limo.

Crewe is desperate to put clear water between the Arnage and the smaller, VW-related Continental family, so the Arnage successor will be targeted very closely at Rolls-Royce's Phantom range.

So the next Arnage will be an uber-expensive saloon?

Spot on. Bentley will unveil the car at the 2009 Frankfurt motor show, and it's likely to cost upwards of £250,000-£300,000 when it hits dealerships in early 2010. Everyone at the VW Group is desperately hoping the looming global recession will have receded by then...

Will the new Arnage just be a big VW then?

Get real – VW has done a brilliant job of bringing Bentley into the 21st century with the Conti family. Now the challenge is to preserve the hand-crafted charm of its biggest model, yet subtly updated with the latest tech and eco brains.

The platform of the old Arnage is in fact due to be carried over, albeit in heavily modified form. The wheelbase is stretched by 150mm, extending the car to around 5500mm long. Extensive use of aluminium should stop the scales protesting too much, but it would have been lighter still if Wolfsburg had successfully pushed through its aluminium A8 engineering package. That plan was rejected at an early stage, as too unbecoming for a proper Bentley.


What's under that – huge! – bonnet?

Bentley is far from pensioning off the half-century-old 6.75-litre V8. The characterful lump is getting a shot in the arm with some fuel-saving tech and we hear it will mix 550bhp power (for the waft) with novel cylinder deactivation systems (for the prudence). ZF's six-speed auto is likely to continue in production, since the market's latest seven- and eight-speed boxes simply can't cope with the Bentley's colossal torque.

The new Bentley Arnage will continue to be built in Crewe and this engineering package will, in time, spawn next-gen successors to the Azure and Brooklands. We'll also see green 'eco' versions, which can run on biofuels and – eventually – hybrids too.

Talk me through the design of the new Bentley Arnage...

We're expecting a subtle upgrade to the regal Arnage look, with new LED lights, incredible attention to detail and – this spyshot of an early prototype reveals – generous proportions to swallow as much luggage as four or five aristocrats could reasonably want to carry.

Jaguar XJ (2010) spy photos



By Ben Pulman

Mad Max has been spotted in the Midlands. Heavily disguised beneath thick black plastic cladding, this futuristic-looking prototype is actually Jaguar’s new XJ mule. Snapped prowling around outside Jaguar’s Whitley R&D base, these pictures show the first XJ mule to wear production-ready bodywork.

This new Jaguar XJ looks very low and swoopy…
Indeed it does, and much more stylish than the X351 codename might suggest. Ignore the disguise above the C-pillars and the very un-Jaguar extra-thick disguise all round, and you’ll be able to take in this prototype’s side view. It’s long and low – as the next XJ is based on the current car’s aluminium platform – with four-door coupe looks.

That ‘four-door coupe’ phrase might be loathsome to some, but when Mercedes designed the mould-breaking CLS it designated the car a Jaguar-beater. At the time Jaguar had no such car, but with a design that is promised to be as forward-thinking as the mule’s post-apocalyptic disguise, the next XJ is set to shed its staid styling.

At the front you’ll find XF-inspired headlights – though hopefully more rakish and C-XF alike – while the rear features hi-tech LED tail lamps including the diagonal indicators visible in our pictures.

And inside the new Jag XJ?
Expect more XF influence, with the rotary dial JaguarDrive replacing the trad J-gate gear selector. The new XJ should also feature the XF’s rotating air vents on start-up, plus the latest sat-nav and multimedia systems to keep tired execs entertained; and while wood trim will be on the options list, expect a plethora of metal trims to drag the XJ’s interior kicking and screaming into the 21st century.


What about the power?
The registration of the car in our pictures – VX58 GCZ – tells us this mule is running the new 4997cc engine. It’s Jaguar’s latest V8 with direct injection and available with or without a supercharger. In forced-induction guise you’ll get a meaty 500bhp, while the naturally aspirated motor will still kick out a satisfactory 400bhp. We’ll see this engine for the first time when it’s unveiled in the XF-R at the Detroit motor show in January 2009.

A new 3.0-litre turbodiesel will provide oil-burning power in the next XJ. Developed from the current PSA-Ford twin-turbo 2.7-litre V6 diesel, the new motor should lift power and torque from today’s 204bhp/320lb ft to nearly 250bhp and over 350lb ft.

Matched to the lightweight aluminium body, it should make the next-gen XJ one of the cleanest and most economical cars in its limo class. We’ll see the new car in 2009, probably at the Frankfurt motor show, before sales start in early 2010.

Ford to sell off Volvo: newsflash


By Tim Pollard

Ford has just announced it is putting Volvo up for sale. The strategic review, announced today, is part of the Blue Oval’s rescue plan and, if it does sell its Swedish outpost, it could add hundreds of millions to Ford’s wonky balance sheet.

The news underlines the collapse of Ford’s global ambitions. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, it carefully built up a portfolio of European premium brands including Volvo, Jaguar, Land Rover and Aston Martin as it assembled the Premier Automotive Group. A decade on, its plans to become a global premium leader lie in tatters.

Ford sold Aston Martin, Jaguar and Land Rover in the past year – and today’s announcement makes it increasingly likely that the Blue Oval will now wash its hands of Volvo, too.

Why Ford is selling Volvo
It doesn’t take an accountant to work out why Ford is likely to flog off Volvo. It needs the cash badly, as it prepares to persuade Congress tomorrow for its share of a $25 billion aid package, and Volvo hasn’t been profitable for years.

It bought Volvo for around $6.5 billion in 1999, but the Swedish premium marque’s results slipped into loss in recent years. Sales so far this year are down 14% to less than 300,000 in the first nine months, while pre-tax losses have crashed to $458 million in the third quarter.

What next?

It seems likely that any sell-off would take a long time. Remember how long it took to shift Jaguar-Land Rover, and even the relatively small business of Aston Martin? Expect a long tendering process and little interest as manufacturers struggle to hold up their businesses, let alone acquire a struggling small-time premium player.

Some observers believe that Volvo could form an alliance with Saab. GM is also considering abandoning its European partner, and the Swedish government is unlikely to let two of its biggest employers collapse. Both Volvo and Saab could be partly privatised, with the Swedish state buying a share, in the same way that Renault is part-owned by the state. And a wider collaboration between the two could be on the cards in the longer term…

The Ford boss speaks
‘Given the unprecedented external challenges facing Ford and the entire industry, it is prudent for Ford to evaluate options for Volvo as we implement our ONE Ford plan,’ said Ford president and CEO Alan Mulally today.

‘Volvo is a strong global brand with a proud heritage of safety and environmental responsibility and has launched an aggressive plan to right-size its operations and improve its financial results. As we conduct this review, we are committed to making the best decision for both Ford and Volvo going forward.’

2010 Mazda 3 Hatchback – Official Photos and Info - Car News


BY DAVID GLUCKMAN

Just days after we were first introduced to the 2010 Mazda 3 sedan at the L.A. show, its five-door hatchback sibling has been unveiled electronically, in advance of its meatspace debut.

On December 3 (Coincidence? We think not), the more useful 3 will be shown at the Bologna motor show in Italy. The hatch shares the sedan’s somewhat-goofy-looking, smiley front end, as well as its new interior and, of course, chassis. Expect the same powertrain options as the current U.S.-market hatch, namely one: the 2.5-liter four. Europeans will be able to choose from among two turbo-diesels and 1.6- and 2.0-liter gas-fired fours, the latter also found in the U.S. sedan.

What’s more exciting for us, though, is the promise of a new Mazdaspeed 3, which will once again be offered in hatchback, front-drive form only. After catching a few glimpses of the speediest of the 3s on the Nürburgring, we’ve been anxiously awaiting further details on the replacement for one of our favorites. It is expected to use the same turbocharged 2.3-liter as now, generating at least the 263 hp of the current model. That car should be arriving for the Geneva show, which takes place in March of next year.

U.S. Forces - American muscle cars



Michael Stahl

A relaxation of import regulations is fuelling a mini nostalgia boom in US muscle cars. Stahly fires up 400 cubes of Detroit iron for his own drive back down memory lane.

If you’re one of the many who regard the 1970s as the decade that taste forgot, you’re not going to like this decade any better. Australia’s automotive landscape is only going to get Drum-rollingly, Amco-Bogartishly, Glo-Weavingly worse.

We’re talking Burt Reynolds, David Soul and David Hasselhoff worse.

There’s already a not-so-quiet revolution occurring on Australia’s roads. It’s been gaining momentum like, well, a two-tonne vehicle with a big-block V8 and undersized drum brakes.

Relaxation of the registration laws for older vehicles [see breakout, right] has been a bonanza for cashed-up baby boomers with a hankerin’ for classic American muscle. And with these ‘classic collectables’ by-passing much of the traditional red-tape, the industry growing around them also fits the wild west theme.

Cars built 30 or more years ago may now be registered in left-hand drive, provided they otherwise meet the roadworthiness requirements in force when they were built. It’s opened a flood of smooth, sixties Mustangs, Mopars, Camaros and Corvettes to soothe our super-heated market of six-figure Aussie supercars. Some put the figure of US imports at 2000 cars every month.

While this isn’t only muscle cars – California-climate Euro sports cars are in high demand, too – it roughly levels the balance of trade of Pontiac G8s headed in the opposite direction.

The Motown imports aren’t all Coke-bottle curves and McQueen cool. The rolling 30-year line means that every year, a fresh Detroit horror is exhumed for the specific, obscure enjoyment of another television-educated, fifty-something Australian male.

The Blues Brothers’ 1974 Dodge Monaco Police Pack has been yours since ’04. Last year opened the T-top on the ’77 Smokey and the Bandit Pontiac TransAm, in all its eagle-bonneted obnoxiousness.

I wanted some ’70s wheels for a personal drive down memory lane. Throughout the late-1970s I raced motocross and dirt circuit. I was always pretty crap at it, but it’s paid long-term dividends: I used up a lifetime’s quota of crashes early, on a relatively soft surface.

Inner-city space constraints have steered my retro-perversions towards motorcycles (and one very small car), but I have no trouble identifying as a mid-forties big kid who’s unashamedly star-struck by his ’70s automotive idols.

One of my bikes, a 1972 Husqvarna 450 WR desert racer, draws a straight line to the blond-haired, buck-toothed 10-year-old kid sitting stunned in front of On Any Sunday at the Roselands Cinema.

Australia’s premier, annual event for vintage motocross is Classic Dirt. The fifth edition, held at Barleigh Ranch a couple of hours north of Sydney, promised whole harems of Husqvarnas, masses of Maicos, a bevy of Bultacos, an orgy of Ossas, slatherings of CZs.

I picked up one of the specialist car-classifieds and rang a few numbers. I phoned three before I located one that didn’t pull a verbal hand-brakey when I mentioned Wheels.

I had a perve around the website for Mick’s US Muscle Cars and Classics (www.usmusclecars.com.au) before calling. Mick’s surname sounded familiar; I remembered his father, Laurie, racing a Mustang in Appendix J, and Mick’s name popping up at Bathurst a couple of times.

Mick ventured, “Mate, come over and take my own car. She’s just a good, honest runner, nothing too flash. A ’76 Pontiac Firebird Esprit 400. I’ve got this because I’m a mad Rockford Files fan, and James Garner drove one.”

Turned out the Rockford-replica Firechicken was only the first part of my journey into television kitsch.

At Mick’s southern Sydney workshop, we were chatting about his racing exploits – father and son finishing 12th at Bathurst in 1993 – when it clicked. For six months during 1992, Mick Donaher and his family were the subjects of the proto-reality television series, Sylvania Waters.

Mick barely disguised a sigh. “Yeah, that often comes up,” he said. “Y’know, they showed six hours of film. And they had over 100 hours on tape. So they could have made us look like the Brady Bunch, they could have made us look like the Manson Family.”

Mick walked away from V8 Supercar racing after a major shunt on top of The Mountain in 2001. These days he races Laurie’s stunning ’69 Camaro and is fair-dinkum about building the US Muscle Cars business.

“I’m a mechanic by trade, and I know those cars,” he explained. “But it’s very hard when you’re an enthusiast as well as a businessman. It’s very difficult to buy with your head and not with your heart.”

All of the above actually makes Donaher over-qualified to be an importer of classic cars. Currently, importers do not need to be licensed automotive dealers, there’s no limit on the number of cars they can import, the vehicles don’t even need to be roadworthy, and there’s no warranty, expressed or implied.

“As it stands now, every man and his dog can bring a car in,” Donaher says. “It’s probably selfish of me, having been in the industry a few years, but it makes sense to me that you should have to be licensed to be an importer. If you had to pay a licence fee of $2000 a year or something, you’re gonna make sure that you’re au fait with the rules.”

In his workshop was an aggressively elegant trio comprising a 1970 Boss Mustang ($99K), a ’68 Dodge Charger R/T 440 ($79,500) and ’72 Plymouth Barracuda 340 ($59,500). There was also a very clean, restored example of the first Mustang (’65) for $27,500. Think what you like about Yank cars, all these are clearly classics.

“I get people coming to me all the time saying, ‘Now, can you recommend a good guy to convert it?’” Mick said. “I say, ‘Do yourself a favour, drive the car for a month. Drive it around, get used to it. ’Cause I’m telling you, this car will become more valuable in time as a LHD car than it will as a RHD.’

“I mean, something like that Boss Mustang – if you converted that car, you would dead-set want shootin’.”

I drove away in Mick’s car, the ultrasonic warbling of the Rockford Files theme inexplicably in my head. There was something instantly likeable about the punch-drunk Pontiac. The dark metallic green paint was in very good condition, meaning it showcased the shittiness of the acrylic enamel in use at the time. The panel gap around the fibreglass bonnet could swallow an adult’s index finger, and I noted GM’s accidental omission of any sideways-facing bonnet scoops.

The chrome-plated key had been worn back to bronze and needed jiggling just-so in the door. Inside was a Dali-esque vision of gently wavy, white plastic panelling, dotted with the exposed heads of screws. Black plastic plugs replaced the window cranks of poverty-pack sister models. And the dual-inertia-reel seatbelts were bizarre to use, the driver’s belt eventually settling precisely upon my left ear-lobe.

But other than sitting on the opposite side, none of this was so different from the pointy-spoked steering wheels, painted-plastic interiors, Fablon woodgrain and slippery vinyl seats of XC Falcons and HZ Holdens.

Some of it was more familiar than expected. I’d always thought (though I hadn’t thought about it often) that Radial Tuned Suspension was a legitimate Holden innovation. Turns out it was just another bullshit badge out of the GM parts bin.

If you did want to, you could probably convert the Firebird to right-hand drive using about one-sixth of a rooted Kingswood.

The Pontiac wasn’t the ideal weapon for the narrow lanes of Sydney’s inner-city. Over-the-shoulder glances at Give Ways, and suddenly billboard-width hatchbacks are a constant challenge from the left seat.

Out on the broader boulevards of the ’burbs, however, then fat-arming it (the a/c wasn’t working) up the Pacific Highway en route to middle-aged motocross Mecca, my seat position ceased to matter. The car’s steering was far less approximate than I’d expected and the disc/drum braking reliably straight, if not particularly strong. One brief, half-inch prod of throttle seemed enough to carry the 400-cubic-inch, 225bhp, tall-diffed behemoth for about 17 miles.

Fuel efficiency was, of course, on the scale of the Exxon Valdez, but on the highway the big Ponty made me feel far too omnipotent and unstressed to bother getting figures on it. Best I can offer is that every time I touched the interior door handle, it seemed to cost me $90.

But I’ve mentioned before that I have occasional use of a Ferrari 400 A. It’s only two years younger than the Firebird, and likewise has a three-speed auto (GM, no less). The Ferrari has leather,
12 cylinders, six Webers, four disc brakes, steel space-frame, double-wishbone suspension – as trick as it got in the late 1970s.

But the Firebird, at 1730kg, is actually 90kg lighter. And with the exception of handling extremes I wouldn’t care to approach in either, it’s no worse to drive. Operating costs would be similar, servicing costs no contest. And, hurting the most, the mass-produced Detroit dunger is today worth as much money as the contemporary flagship of the Ferrari range.

Turns out it’s the exact opposite with the dream dirt-bikes of my youth. In the early-1980s, fancy-pants brands like Maico and Husqvarna would sell you one of their 250cc ‘works replica’ models for around $3000; Yamaha YZs, Honda CRs, Kawasaki KXs and Suzuki RMs were around $2000.

Today, that might find you a chook-chasing basket-case; with a booming repro parts industry, good examples of Japanese and Europeans typically run from $4000-$6000.

Models sought for their rarity (like Yamaha’s 1976 four-stroke TT500) or for vintage racing competitiveness (the magnesium-engined 1974 Husqvarna 250 CR) are closer to $8K.

Remember the Honda XR-75? The four-stroke Honda minibike was every schoolboy’s dream from its launch in 1973, and out of the reach of most. Lined up in a marquee at Classic Dirt, one owner displayed his collection of restored K0 through K3 models … any one of which, today, would start at $5K.

When I first pulled the Pontiac up at the Barleigh Ranch gate, the unknown guy at the gate said, “You used to race, didn’t you? St George club, wasn’t it?”

Given that I’d never achieved anything of note, I was impressed. And I, too, started recognising riders’ names and jerseys.

Vintage motocross racing is as fast or as flabby as you want it. Vintage dirt lets guys like hardcore Husky fan Glenn Wollenweber and CZ nutcase Robin Hall bring their whole collections of bikes and, er, cycle through them all weekend.

Pointing the Pontiac home, I could fully understand how some blokes get their yucks cruising in a Yank tank. Seems a waste of crudeness to me, when one’s ride back in time can be even dirtier, muddier, bumpier, ruttier, noisier and smokier.

2010 Ford Mustang - Car News



BY CSABA CSERE, PHOTOGRAPHY BY FOREST CASEY AND THE MANUFACTURER

With Dodge having introduced its new Challenger last spring and Chevy’s new Camaro about to go on sale, Ford could hardly stand pat with its current Mustang, which is now four years old. That’s why Henry’s company introduced this new 2010 version of its venerable pony car at the Los Angeles auto show.

The keen observer will notice a close resemblance to the current model in size, profile, and overall shape. In fact, the 2010 Mustang is not an all-new model, but rather a heavily revised version of the current car, with changes concentrated in the areas that called for the most improvement.

The new version uses the roof and A-pillars from the old one. But the front and rear of the pony car are now slightly tapered, and the fender flares have been toned down. Three-segment taillights with sequential turn-signal operation look trick and recall Thunderbirds and Mercury Cougars of the Sixties. A more muscular appearance comes from a power dome on the hood, small haunches over the rear wheels, and more aggressive front and rear fascias. At the same time, the new model, though dimensionally unchanged, appears to be smaller than the current car—which is not a bad thing in today’s pricey fuel climate.

The interior is where Ford invested its greatest effort. A new dashboard made from one giant soft-plastic molding looks and feels much richer than the several hard pieces it replaces. The metallic trim is real aluminum and different in texture on the V-6 and V-8 models. In fact, the shift knob and everything else that looks like aluminum is indeed the genuine metal. A reconfigured console should be softer on your knees when bracing them during hard driving, the optional leather seats show off beautiful stitching, and a navigation system with an eight-inch screen, reverse camera, and Sync 2.0 is optional.

Mechanically, there are no major changes (at least not yet; more powerful engines are supposedly on their way for 2011), but the new GT is an evolution of the current generation’s Bullitt model, which it allegedly outperforms. Small changes to the GT’s powertrain include a cold air intake, a 250-rpm bump to the V-8’s redline, and 3.5-inch exhaust tips out back. The Bullitt connection means 315 horsepower from the 4.6-liter three-valve V-8, and reworked suspension calibrations optimized for standard 18-inch and optional 19-inch tires. A new stability control system has also been implemented; it includes an intermediate “Track” setting in addition to full on and off operation. Spread across two optional performance packages are high-grip summer tires, track-ready brake pads, GT500 anti-roll bars and rear lower control arms, and a shorter 3.73:1 axle ratio.

The V-6 model also gets an uprated suspension with tires that are an inch larger, though the V-6 output remains a flaccid 210 hp. The new bodywork reduced the drag coefficient on both versions by four to seven percent. Ford claims that improvements in window and door seals have reduced wind noise as well.

2010 Audi A7 - Spied


BY TONY QUIROGA, PHOTOGRAPHY BY LEHMANN PHOTO-SYNDICATE FOR BRENDA PRIDDY & COMPANY AND THE MANUFACTURERS


Spy shots of the A7, Audi’s upcoming low-roofline sedan, continue to surface. The A7 is likely to be based on the next-generation A6 architecture, which itself will be a lengthened and modified version of the current A4/A5 platform. Judging from the name, the four-seat A7 should slot into the Audi lineup above the A6 and below the A8 and will likely occupy the $50,000-to-$70,000 price range. The grainy new snaps seen here clearly show the A7’s bulbous rear end, which hides a hatchback configuration, a body style that resembles the recently revealed—and not beautiful—Porsche Panamera.

In the U.S. we’re expecting that base A7s will be powered by the A6’s recently introduced 300-hp, 3.0-liter supercharged V-6; V-8 engines are almost a certainty but we don’t yet know if the V-8 will be the A6’s direct-injection 350-hp, 4.2-liter V-8 or the R8’s 420-hp, 4.2-liter V-8. Transmission choices will be a six-speed automatic, a seven-speed dual-clutch automated manual, and an eight-speed automatic that will likely be reserved for the V-8 model.

After the launch of the regular-grade models, the sportier and more powerful S7 will debut, powered by the S6’s 5.2-liter V-10 with upwards of 435 hp under the hood. An ultra-powerful RS7 is a possibility, although it, like the current RS6 sedan and wagon, may be deemed too expensive and too niche-y for the North American market.

Audi usually shows a thinly disguised concept version before showing the final production car, and we expect such a concept of the A7 to debut in early 2009 at the Detroit auto show, with the production version appearing perhaps as early as the Geneva auto show in the spring.