New Mercedes ML-Class revealed

Daniel DeGasperi
SMH
This third-gen model, codenamed W166, will offer a 2.1-litre twin-turbo diesel rated at just 5.0L/100km, despite healthy 500Nm/150kW outputs. A seven-speed automatic transmission is standard, and teams with stop-start and brake energy regeneration tech to help the ML250 Bluetec variant achieve the class-leading fuel figure.

Other ML models set to launch include a 3.0-litre V6 ML350 Bluetec and 5.5-litre twin-turbo V8 ML63 AMG (the latter understandably without a ‘Bluetec’ tag). Later next year a diesel-electric ML300 Hybrid will debut, teaming the ML250’s turbo-diesel with a 15kW electric motor.

While the ML’s exterior and interior are all-new – with a CL-style wide-mouthed front grille and deeper, more prominent side character creases – it retains the basic proportion of the current generation. The Merc SUV’s platform is shared with the new-gen Jeep Grand Cherokee, however the ML remains a five-seat-only proposition

Mini Coupe

Ninemsn
BMW has released its first official images of the forthcoming Mini Coupe, along with full details on the new two-door bodystyle and available drivetrains.

Designed as a premium compact coupe, the two-seat three-box Mini is 20mm longer than the hatch (at 3734mm) with an identical 2467mm wheelbase. It is the same width, but 29mm lower (1384mm). Its track (both front and rear) is pushed out by 4mm.

The Mini Coupe’s styling features include a flat silhouette, “helmet roof”, integral roof spoiler and an active rear spoiler that extends automatically at 80km/h.

Although the Coupe is strictly a two-seater, a large, high-opening tailgate and a wide through-loading system that can be opened from the driver’s or passenger’s seat, is standard.

Powertrains available internationally include 90kW atmo 1.6 (Cooper), 135kW turbo 1.6 (Cooper S) and 155kW turbo 1.6 (Cooper JCW) petrols, and a 105kW/305Nm 2.0-litre turbo diesel. All hook up to a six-speed manual or (with the exception of JCW) six-speed automatic gearbox.

BMW Australia is yet to announce which of these variants will arrive here when the Mini Coupe launches locally in November

Mercedes launches C-Class facelift

Daniel DeGasperi
Mercedes launches C-Class facelift
Mercedes launches C-Class facelift
Mercedes launches C-Class facelift

2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor - First Drive Review


BY MIKE SUTTON

Photos (50) Visit Our Buyer's Guide »Ford F-150
› Overview› Specifications› Price with Options› Get a Free Quote News & Reviews
•2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor - First Drive Review
•2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor - Auto Shows
With flamboyant, seven-foot-wide bodywork plastered with “digital mud,” an industry-first long-travel suspension, and a résumé that includes a third-in-class finish at the Baja 1000, Ford’s 2010 F-150 SVT Raptor is about as subtle as the feeling one gets sitting on a cactus. Naked. That a street-legal, 6000-pound pickup designed to traverse the open desert at 100 mph even made it past Dearborn’s Byzantine and conservative product-review board is a miracle in itself. But after a grueling and secretive development period—during which Ford’s marketing department was heard talking of driving the truck “right up Toyota’s ass”—it did. And we can confirm after some thrilling seat time near California’s Anza-Borrego Desert State Park that the Raptor is one of the most formidable off-road production vehicles ever built.

No Comparisons

Ever-greater performance vehicles come out all the time. And with each new iteration, we usually can sum up their placement on our automotive totem pole by referencing how much quicker they are than this, or how they grip the road better than that. But there are no formal benchmarks for the Raptor; this is way beyond Rovers, Hummers, and Unimogs.

A track widened seven inches over a normal F-150, with reinforced underpinnings suspended by unique front coil springs and rear leaf springs, are what give the Raptor its impressive front/rear suspension articulation of 11.2 and 12.1 inches, respectively. Cool details abound the chassis, too, particularly the “SVT” stampings on the aluminum control arms. But the magic lies in the massive, three-stage, internal-bypass shocks from Fox Racing. Commonly found in purpose-built racing trucks and pre-runners, these high-end units compress progressively, with a firm initial stage for good body control and softer second and third stages that allow maximum wheel travel at high speeds off road.

Specifications
VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 2+2-door truck

BASE PRICE: $38,995

ENGINE TYPE: SOHC 24-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection

Displacement: 330 cu in, 5400cc
Power (SAE net): 310 bhp @ 5000 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 365 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 6-speed automatic

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 133.0 in Length: 220.9 in Width: 86.3 in Height: 78.4 in
Curb weight (C/D est): 6000 lb

PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 8.3 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 17.8 sec
Top Speed (governor limited): 100 mph

FUEL ECONOMY:
EPA city/highway driving: 14/18 mpg

On the highway, the Raptor feels much like the softer-sprung, four-wheel-drive F-150 on which it’s based, with the shocks keeping the body from flopping about during transitions. Get the Raptor in its element, though, and it gobbles up rough terrain like a Ferrari tackling a chicane. Traversing a winding desert wash with large rocks, undulations, and two-foot-tall whoops, we frequently reached highway speeds with little drama. Ford’s more experienced pilots regularly hit the truck’s 100-mph speed governor over the same section. That the company’s own press photos show the truck launching all four wheels several feet in the air speak to what the Raptor was built for. We of course had to try, more than once, and almost succeeded—albeit by accident—in clearing a two-lane fire road at what felt like 50 mph. That landing was a little rough, but the truck rarely bottomed out during our drive and we never wished for a neck brace or kidney belt.

More Than Just Fancy Shocks

If the Raptor’s added width and trick dampers are its foundation, its myriad electronic and drivetrain upgrades make up the total package. At each corner are beefed-up disc brakes (13.8 inches in front, 13.7 in the rear) surrounded by 17-inch alloy wheels and SVT-specific, 35-inch BFGoodrich all-terrain tires. Differentials with 4.10:1 gears help turn the hefty rolling stock, and the rear axle sports an electronic locker that can spool both wheels together for maximum traction. Ford’s two-stage electronic-stability-control system also sports a special off-road mode that raises the threshold for yaw and anti-lock-brake intervention, sharpens throttle response, re-maps the six-speed automatic to hold gears longer, and allows the locking diff to stay activated up to the vehicle’s top speed. A new hill-descent-control system also is included and worked great to limit our speed while crawling down steep slopes lined with jagged rocks and deep holes.


All this hardware makes for very high handling limits off road, and we quickly learned that owners will need to build up the skill—and bravado—to make the most of it. Because of the inherent nature of the bypass shocks, the Raptor actually seemed to ride smoother the faster we hit obstacles; hold back or stab the brakes and the front end would compress violently over whoops. Even more exhilarating was the high-speed stability afforded by the wider track. With the off-road electronics, the wheels can be locked up initially for better braking on loose ground, while also permitting gratuitous, Scandinavian-flick rally turns at speeds that would send normal trucks into barrel rolls. A Land Rover-esque off-road-driving school might not be a bad idea here, Ford.

Still an F-150 Underneath

Yet, second only to its prowess off road, the Raptor’s most surprising attribute is that it performs much like a regular F-150 everywhere else. Sure, it’s a couple inches taller (which you notice behind the wheel) and nearly one foot wider (which you really don’t), but on the pavement it’s quiet, composed, and about as well behaved as one could expect from such a dirt-oriented setup. Braking performance felt respectable and the extra cushion in the suspension made for a compliant ride with less of the rear-axle hop common with unladen pickups. Road noise and tire roar also weren’t bad, owing mostly to the softer compound employed in the special BFG rubber.

Inside is a mostly standard F-150 cabin, which is a pretty pleasant place to start. Nicely bolstered sport seats kept us supported and comfortable, while the contoured steering wheel felt great when sending commands to the revised steering rack. Other touches include white-faced SVT gauges and new console-mounted controls for the off-road electronics and auxiliary power switches. Optional Molten Orange seat inserts and trim help brighten the mostly dark interior, but we could live without the center-console appliqué, which looks like a cheap sticker from the local auto parts store. Even without the huge F-O-R-D spelled out across the new grille, the Raptor is instantly recognizable as an F-150, albeit one with ultra-aggressive proportions and an imposing stance. And there are plenty of cool details here, too, including skid plates galore, functional heat extractors on the hood and fenders, beefy hydroformed bumpers, and LED marker lights in the grille and on the flared wheel arches. Available colors are limited to orange, black, blue, or white.

Specifications
VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 2+2-door truck


BASE PRICE: $38,995


ENGINE TYPE: SOHC 24-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection


Displacement: 330 cu in, 5400cc
Power (SAE net): 310 bhp @ 5000 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 365 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm


TRANSMISSION: 6-speed automatic


DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 133.0 in Length: 220.9 in Width: 86.3 in Height: 78.4 in
Curb weight (C/D est): 6000 lb


PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 8.3 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 17.8 sec
Top Speed (governor limited): 100 mph

FUEL ECONOMY:
EPA city/highway driving: 14/18 mpg

Wait for the Boss

Our only real complaint with the Raptor is the 310-hp, 5.4-liter V-8 that comes with the $38,995 base price. Feeling woefully over-taxed by the vehicle’s mass and large tires, it strains to move the truck up hills and out of corners with any verve. The six-speed automatic helps, and the issue isn’t as bad in the dirt, where the suspension allows you to build and keep momentum. But we frequently had the throttle mashed to the floor just to get moving at a normal pace. Fortunately, a new Boss 6.2-liter V-8 will be available early next year, packing around 400 hp and adding $3000 to the sticker. Other major options include a luxury package (power heated mirrors and front seats, dual-zone climate control, an upgraded stereo, and adjustable pedals), moonroof, navigation, and the aforementioned body graphics.

Although a fully loaded Raptor should top out near $50K, the package seems like a bargain, considering it is still drivable everyday, can tow 6000 pounds, and carries a factory warranty. And then there’s the off-road performance, which would require at least $20K in modifications on top of an F-150 FX4 ($36,065 base) to match. Ford says its Dearborn truck plant will be able to turn out up to 5000 or so Raptors annually and that there also will be plenty of performance accessories available in the near future. As it is, the Raptor is the most unique SVT-engineered vehicle next to the 550-hp Ford GT supercar, and that’s saying something. Maybe it’s time we define a new category of vehicle: the supertruck.

2010 Porsche 911 Turbo - Official Photos and Info


BY JENS MEINERS

More than one year after the regular Porsche 911 migrated to Phase II of the 997 architecture, the Turbo follows. The most important change: A new twin-turbocharged, direct-injection flat-six engine with higher compression (9.8:1, from 9.0:1), a displacement of 3.8 liters (up from 3.6) and 20 more horsepower—the new 911 Turbo makes 500 hp at 6000 rpm, versus the previous model's 480 hp. Maximum torque for the new car is 479 lb-ft at 1950 rpm (516 lb-ft at 2100 rpm with the optional Sport Chrono package), while its predecessor delivered 460 lb-ft (505 lb-ft with Sport Chrono).

Porsche says the revisions improve the Turbo's already stellar performance, with the company claiming the run to 60 mph now takes 3.2 seconds; a 0–60 sprint of 3.4 seconds is the best we’ve recorded for the previous model. Top speed rises 1 mph to an ungoverned 194. However, a more noticeable improvement is the Turbo's efficiency. Carbon-dioxide emissions are said to be 18 percent less than before, and while U.S. EPA ratings are not yet available, combined fuel economy in the European cycle has increased from the equivalent of 18 mpg to 20 mpg for 2010.

Part of the improved fuel economy is due to the optional ZF-supplied, seven-speed Porsche-Doppelkupplungsgetriebe (PDK) dual-clutch automated manual transmission. It replaces the former Aisin five-speed automatic, and its seventh gear is extremely tall for more-efficient cruising. As with non-turbo 911s, the gearbox also is configured to upshift more quickly when you push the "Sport" or "Sport Plus" button, which also are part of the Sport Chrono package. More important, though, is that the counterintuitive and awkwardly positioned steering-wheel buttons that operate the manual-shift function—they require you to push away to upshift and pull towards you to downshift, and are easy to hit accidentally—can now be replaced with proper, wheel-mounted paddle shifters; pull the left one to downshift, the right one to upshift. Bravo to Porsche for offering the option and we hope the new steering wheel becomes available across the company’s entire lineup.

Of course, you can also opt for the standard six-speed manual, which we’ve found in the previous model to be smooth, precise, and perfectly suited to the Turbo. All-wheel drive remains standard and a new, available torque-vectoring system is likely to push the Turbo's agility and handling limits to new heights. Also featured are the dynamic engine mounts introduced on the 2010 911 GT3, revised traction- and stability-control systems, optional carbon-ceramic brakes, and available multi-spoke, 19-inch RS Spyder wheels with center-locking hubs.

There are surprisingly few changes to the exterior. The front fascia is unchanged, except for slightly accentuated horizontal strips on the huge front air intakes. The xenon headlights are carried over from the regular 911. Most noticeable are the current 911's LED taillights. The rear bumper is slightly altered for bigger exhaust openings, but you really have to see the old and new car next to each other to tell the difference.

At $132,800 for the coupe and $143,800 for the cabriolet, the 2010 Turbo is priced about $2000 more than the 2009 model. And it's facing strong competition, namely from the Nissan GT-R, and the upcoming Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG and Audi R8 5.2 V-10. Only the rear-wheel-drive GT2 has yet to be fitted with the 997’s latest advancements. However, Porsche already is busily working on the next generation of the 911, internally called 991.

The new Turbo will officially debut in September at the Frankfurt auto show, with European sales starting November 21 and U.S. deliveries commencing in January 2010. We hope to drive the new car shortly after its unveiling, at which time we will of course bring you our initial thoughts of it on the road.

2010 Kia Forte Koup - First Drive Review


BY DAVE VANDERWERP
To separate itself from the pack—not to mention sister company Hyundai—Kia says it wants to become a design-led automaker.

Kia gave itself a good start by hiring an Audi designer. No, really, that’s exactly what it did in 2006 when it lured Peter Schreyer away from the German company. We think it’s working, too, as we’re now starting to see the effects.

First to catch our eye was the new, boxy Soul that has a distinct and compelling look that’s youthful without crossing the weirdness boundary, as do some of its competitors, such as the Nissan Cube. Now there’s the Forte, which looks handsome in sedan form but positively stylish as a two-door coupe. Sitting 0.4-inch closer to the ground with a 2.4-inch lower roofline that’s not unlike that of an Audi A5, the only piece of the sedan’s sheetmetal carried over to the Koup is the hood. We particularly appreciated its sleekness from behind, where the squashed rear taillights make it stand out from the sedan. A five-door hatchback model will join the Forte lineup in 2010.

The Koup’s mechanicals, however, are nearly unchanged except that it drops the base LX trim, as well as the available EX fuel-economy model. EX Koups get a 156-hp, 2.0-liter four paired with either a four-speed automatic or a five-speed manual. We drove only SXs, which come with a 173-hp, 2.4-liter inline-four and a five-speed auto or six-speed manual, along with slightly larger front brakes, a stiffer suspension tune, 17-inch wheels, and a tilt-and-telescoping steering wheel. The SX also gets some interior upgrades, including a classy red halo that rings the speedo and the gimmicky red lights seen first on the Soul that can be set to flash to the beat of whatever’s playing on the stereo. Kia says it’s still mulling a higher-performance version. How about adapting the 210-hp, 2.0-liter turbo from the Hyundai Genesis Coupe to the front-drive Forte?

Specifications
VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 2-door coupe
ESTIMATED BASE PRICE: EX, $16,500 / SX, $18,000
ENGINE TYPE: DOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum block and head, port fuel injection
Displacement: 122 cu in, 1998cc / 144 cu in, 2359cc
Power (SAE net): 156 bhp @ 6200 rpm / 173 bhp @ 6000 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 144 lb-ft @ 4300 rpm / 168 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 4- or 5-speed automatic with manumatic shifting; 5- or 6-speed manual
DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 104.3 in Length: 176.4 in Width: 69.5 in Height: 55.1 in
Curb weight (C/D est): 2750–2900 lb
PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 8.3–9.1 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 16.3–17.1 sec
Top speed (governor limited): 130 mph
FUEL ECONOMY:
EPA city/highway driving: 22–25/31–34 mpg
Attractive Cabin to Match the Stylish Exterior

The interior itself is well executed in hard plastics, which are par for this class, and the control layout and ergonomics are spot on. We have just one minor complaint: since the iPod connector is right below the HVAC controls in front of the shifter, there’s no place to stash an iPod out of sight when it’s connected. Plan on unplugging your device before parking to discourage thievery.

Kia is quick to brag about the Forte’s above-average horsepower in its class, but as we discovered in a recent test of a SX sedan, the Forte won’t be known as a sprinter. Expect 0-to-60-mph runs in the low eights for an SX manual; the same sprints may stretch into the nines with lesser-engine EXs. On the bright side, at least the Koup’s fuel-economy ratings are above average: EX models are rated at 25/34 mpg city/highway while SXs achieve 22/32 for the manual and 23/31 for the automatic.

It would be difficult to deliver a driving experience as impressive as the exterior styling, and the Koup struggles. We’d say it’s solidly average. Clutch take-up is smooth in the six-speed, but the shifter feels imprecise and has a fair amount of play in it. And someone needs to tell Kia that aggressive throttle tip-in does not make a car sporty. It only makes a driver annoyed at the difficulty in being smooth. Despite the jumpy throttle, however, the engine is somewhat sluggish to respond to a quick, downshift-enabling throttle blip. The automatic works well and will likely be the more popular choice.

Say “Bye-Bye” to Soft-Riding Kias

Gone are the days of roly-poly, softly sprung Kias. During our brief drive in South Korea, the Koup sometimes felt too stiff over the pothole-ridden roads surrounding Seoul. It occasionally felt a bit befuddled, too, reminding us of its twist-beam rear axle and not the more sophisticated independent suspension found on some of the competition, such as the Honda Civic and Scion tC. We’ll reserve final judgment on ride until we get one back at headquarters for more extended evaluation. The steering feels slightly artificial, like perhaps a bit too much feedback has been filtered out, but it has a nice on-center heft and responds predictably and linearly.

Buyers may want to consider skipping the leather option and sticking with the grippy and comfortable cloth seats, as the Forte’s skidpad and braking numbers should be among the tops in the category. (The SX sedan we recently tested pulled a lofty 0.85 g on the skidpad and stopped from 70 mph in 173 feet). Anyone much over six-feet tall will also want to pass on the sunroof in the name of headroom, which has decreased by 1.3 inches compared to the sedan. In back, a significant 2.5 inches of headroom has been extracted from a space that would otherwise be reasonably roomy.

Pricing for the Koup will likely be very similar to that of the sedan when it arrives in late August. Figure $16,500 for an EX and about $18,000 for an SX. All models get a hefty load of standard equipment including six airbags, stability control, a surprisingly potent six-speaker stereo with USB and auxiliary inputs and an iPod connector, Bluetooth connectivity, power windows and locks, and air conditioning. We’re not sure Kia needs the cutesy Koup misspelling to attract attention. In this inexpensive segment, the high level of style delivered by the company’s first-ever coupe is all it needs to stand out.

2010 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG - First Drive Review


BY MIKE AUSTIN

It’s a shame that infomercial pitchman Billy Mays passed away just as Mercedes-Benz is launching the performance version of the 2010 E-class, because he would have done an excellent job of touting the many uses for the new and improved 2010 E63 AMG. “The 518-hp V-8,” Mays would say in his booming voice, “rockets you from 0 to 60 mph in 4.4 seconds, making quick work of sports cars with less than half the seating. And you can still use it every day to pick Junior up from school and drop Grandma off at the library.” Not that the E63 is the sort of car that would be hawked via cable-TV ads, but it does promise a “You won’t believe your eyes!” combination of performance and usability. There are no easy payments, however, despite the fact that when the E63 goes on sale in October, pricing should fall below that of its predecessor. Expect to pay just under $88,000 to start.

Highly Evolved from the Standard E-class

Specifications
VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan

ESTIMATED BASE PRICE: $88,000

ENGINE TYPE: DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection

Displacement: 379 cu in, 6208
Power (SAE net): 518 bhp @ 6800 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 465 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 7-speed automatic with manumatic shifting

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 113.2 in Length: 192.6 in Width: 75.9 in Height: 56.8 in
Curb weight (C/D est): 4300 lb

PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 4.0 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.5 sec
Top speed/with Performance package (governor limited): 155/186 mph

FUEL ECONOMY (MFR’S EST):
EPA city/highway driving: 13/20 mpg

Previous E-class AMGs merely had stiffened versions of the standard suspension, but like its little brother, the C63 AMG, the new E63 gets a seriously reworked suspension compared with that of the standard car on which it’s based. The 2010 version gets an entirely new front axle with a 2.2-inch-wider track. Spring rates are twice as stiff as the regular car's, necessitating a change from air springs to conventional coils. Load-leveling air springs remain at the rear. In addition, the anti-roll bars and the subframe bushings have been beefed up. And if the standard E63 is too soft for you, a Performance package stiffens up the front anti-roll bar and the tuning on the standard adaptive dampers, adds lightweight 19-inch forged alloy wheels, and raises the electronically governed top speed from 155 mph to 186. With both the 18- and 19-inch wheels, the tire width is 255 in front and 285 in the rear. The steering ratio, at 14.0:1, is 22 percent quicker than in the regular E-class and uses a direct, rather than variable, rack.

Under the hood is the venerable 32-valve 6.2-liter V-8 (the 63 in the car’s name and the 6.3 badges on its front fenders pay homage to an older engine with a true 6.3-liter displacement). Here it makes 518 hp, an increase of 11 over the old E63, mostly due to a freer-flowing exhaust. Torque remains the same at 465 lb-ft. New to this car is a clutch-activated (no, there’s no clutch pedal, but we’ll get to that part in a sec) alternator, which allows the engine to charge the electrical system only during coasting to save on fuel. Overall, the E63 is 12 percent more efficient in the European combined fuel-economy cycle.

The engine is paired to a seven-speed automatic, but it’s coupled to the engine via a wet-plate clutch instead of a traditional torque converter. First seen on the SL63 AMG, this arrangement allows for a more direct connection between the engine and gears and results in quicker shift response. As in the SL63, there are multiple settings: C (for “controlled efficiency”), sport, sport plus, manual, and race mode launch control.

Controlled efficiency mode (can’t we just call it comfort?) starts from a stop in second gear and acts much like a regular automatic, choosing the highest ratio whenever possible. Sport mode is slightly more aggressive and shifts with a little more force. We like sport plus most of all, however, since it holds gears and enacts rev-matching downshifts. Enabling sport plus or manual makes for the quickest shifts, which add a delightful crackle to the exhaust note. New to the E63 is a simplified shift lever with three positions: reverse, neutral, and drive. Park is activated by pressing a button, and manual shifts are actuated via the steering-wheel-mounted paddles.